Conservatism bias

Conservatism bias is a cognitive bias that refers to the tendency of individuals to favor existing information or beliefs over new and contrary information. This bias leads people to be overly cautious when updating their beliefs or making decisions, as they tend to stick to their initial views even in the face of strong contradictory evidence.

This bias can manifest in various contexts, such as financial decision-making, political beliefs, and problem-solving. People affected by conservatism bias may be hesitant to change their minds, even when presented with substantial evidence that contradicts their current beliefs.

The Historian's Dilemma

As a historian, I want to write an accurate and comprehensive account of a significant historical event, but I find myself facing the challenge of conservatism bias. Throughout my academic career, I have been deeply invested in a particular narrative about the event, which has been widely accepted by scholars for decades.

Recently, new evidence and perspectives have emerged that challenge some key aspects of the established historical interpretation. As I embark on my research, I realize that I must confront my own biases and be open to reevaluating my preconceived notions.

I start by reviewing the new findings and engaging in discussions with other historians who hold different viewpoints. This process is challenging because my initial reaction is to defend the traditional interpretation I have studied and taught for years. However, I recognize the importance of objectivity and the pursuit of historical truth.

To overcome my conservatism bias, I decide to approach the research with a fresh perspective, treating the new evidence with the same level of scrutiny I would apply to any historical sources. I conduct thorough investigations, examining primary sources, eyewitness accounts, and other credible historical documents.

As I delve deeper into the research, I start to acknowledge that some elements of the old narrative might not stand up to the weight of the newly discovered evidence. This realization prompts me to reassess my initial conclusions and consider revising my interpretation of the historical event.

It becomes evident that embracing the new perspectives and updating the historical account is essential to maintain the integrity of my work and contribute to the advancement of historical knowledge. I choose to be transparent about the evolution of my interpretation, acknowledging the impact of conservatism bias on historical scholarship in my writing.

In the end, I produce a more nuanced and accurate historical account that incorporates the new evidence and addresses the limitations of the previous narrative. I recognize that overcoming conservatism bias has been a challenging but rewarding journey, as it has enriched my understanding of the historical event and the complexities of human history.

My revised work receives praise for its balanced approach and its willingness to embrace change, inspiring other historians to also confront their biases and continually reassess their interpretations in the pursuit of historical truth.